On February 27, news reports stated that Sam Bankman-Fried, who is serving time for the FTX collapse case, recently posted on social platform X, publicly supporting the proposed CLARITY Act, calling it “an important milestone in the crypto space” and attributing it to Trump’s policy push. This statement quickly sparked a backlash in U.S. politics.
Sam Bankman-Fried said that he had advocated for similar legislation before his indictment, aiming to limit the regulatory authority of former Gary Gensler. He also hinted that regulatory actions are related to political factors, once again touching on whether his case is subject to political interference.
Responses from both parties were very direct. Cynthia Lummis pointed out that some “try to seek amnesty” without realizing that the CLARITY Act could lead to harsher legal consequences. She emphasized that her push for crypto market structure reform is entirely different from the lobbying efforts in 2022 and straightforwardly stated that she does not need the other’s endorsement.
Elizabeth Warren also warned that Sam Bankman-Fried’s support itself is a risk signal. She reiterated that crypto regulation legislation must focus on investor protection and financial stability, not on relaxing enforcement boundaries.
Amid the ongoing fallout from FTX’s multi-billion dollar bankruptcy, discussions around the regulatory framework for the crypto market in the U.S. are becoming increasingly intense. The CLARITY Act, as a potential reform plan for the crypto market structure, is caught in highly politicized battles. Sam Bankman-Fried’s comments not only failed to reshape his image but also made the legislative environment for the bill more complicated.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SEC Submits “Crypto Safe Harbor” Proposal for White House Review! Chairman Paul Atkins: Roll Out Soon (in the Short Term)
U.S. SEC Chair Atkins confirmed that a proposal for a “safe harbor framework” that would allow crypto-asset projects to be exempt from registration in the early stages has been submitted to the White House for review. The proposal is intended to help startups raise funding while protecting investors, and includes provisions for a “startup exemption” and an “investment contract safe harbor.” However, the legislative process for regulating cryptocurrencies faces difficulties, and Paul Atkins emphasized that a stable legal foundation is more important than administrative rules.
区块客8m ago
Thailand’s SEC plans to bring the hidden funding parties behind crypto companies into shareholder oversight reviews
The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission proposes bringing into regulation the sources of funds behind crypto-asset company shareholders, aiming to curb hidden capital flows and the infiltration of illegal funds. This proposal includes reviews for both directly and indirectly supporting parties, and for shareholders of government-related entities, it only examines their shareholdings.
GateNews3h ago
Thailand proposes tighter scrutiny of funders behind crypto firms
Thailand’s securities regulator is seeking to curb money laundering and technology-related crimes by tightening funding rules for cryptocurrency companies.
The Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (Thai SEC) on Monday proposed expanding approval requirements for crypto businesses to
Cointelegraph3h ago
South Korea takes away exchange discretion in a major anti-phishing crackdown
South Korea's financial regulators have mandated that all domestic crypto exchanges implement a uniform withdrawal delay system to combat voice phishing scams. This decision removes prior flexibility for platforms in managing withdrawal exceptions, aiming to give victims time to reconsider transactions.
CoinDesk4h ago
White House CEA: Banning stablecoin yields will have little to no impact on community banks; USDC rewards can still be profitable
The White House Council of Economic Advisers released a report stating that prohibiting crypto companies from offering stablecoin yield will have a negligible impact on community banks, with traditional loan growth of only 0.02%. The report said the ban deprives consumers of competitive returns and reflects tensions between the crypto industry and banking. The conclusion differs significantly from the risks warned by the Community Bankers Association, and could have potential effects on the market and investors.
GateNews5h ago
U.S. SEC Chair Terminates “Enforcement-Style Regulation,” Says 7 Crypto Cases from the Previous Administration Were a Misallocation of Resources
Gate News update: On April 8, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Paul Atkins announced that he has ended “enforcement-led regulation,” and said that the seven crypto-related registration cases brought by the previous administration were a “misallocation of resources,” providing no direct benefit to investors.
GateNews5h ago
