【$ONT Signal】Pullback confirmation, multiple armies gathering $ONT 1H level pullback to EMA20 confirms support is effective, buying depth in the 0.1170-0.1180 range is unusually thick, selling pressure is quickly absorbed. Although the MACD histogram is below the zero line, signs of contraction are obvious, indicating bearish momentum is weakening. 🎯Direction: Long ⚡Entry/Order: 0.1092 - 0.1120 🛑Stop Loss: 0.0972 🚀Target 1: 0.1491 🚀Target 2: 0.1677 🛡️Trade Management: - Execution Strategy: Reduce 50% of positions after reaching Target 1, and move the stop loss to break-even. If the price falls back into the entry zone, automatically exit to protect capital. Market data shows that buy orders are densely accumulated around the 0.117 area, indicating a clear intention to support. The 1-hour RSI is at a healthy 58.66, with ample room above. Combined with the middle band support of Bollinger Bands and the EMA20 convergence, this position offers a very favorable risk-reward ratio. Major players are clearly defending the market, locking in short-term downside potential. View real-time quotes 👇 $ONT --- Follow me: Get more real-time analysis and insights on the crypto market! $BTC $ETH $SOL ‍#四月行情预测 #加密市场普遍上涨 #金银同步走强

Overnight cryptocurrency market shows divergence, with major tokens exhibiting a structural trend under regulatory expectations. As of 6:02 AM today (UTC+8), data from Gate.io indicates: Main cryptocurrencies performance: BTC: $68,332.00 (+0.20% ) - Holding steady above the $68,000 psychological level ETH: $2,158.18 (+2.73% ) - Leading mainstream coins, breaking through $2,150 SOL: $81.95 (-0.93%) - Continuing range-bound oscillation BNB: $614.50 (-0.51%) - Slight pullback and correction

During my sleep time, @DriftProtocol was hacked for 285M in assets. Event cause: The core issue was the leakage of Drift's multi-signature key. The attacker modified the admin permissions of the Drift state account and obtained approval from a multi-signature member, gaining control over the protocol funds. The attacker quickly sold most of the stolen Solana assets and transferred about 130,000 ETH to the Ethereum network via cross-chain bridge services like Mayan Finance. During the incident, on-chain data showed the attacker held assets worth $141 million in SOL, $82 million in ETH, and $18 million in BTC. Arbitrage opportunities: 1️⃣ Certainly, there is an on-chain and off-chain price difference for $Drfit and some stolen tokens. Whether using flash loans or direct purchases, exploiting these price differences should be very profitable. 2️⃣ Bridge arbitrage: During such large-scale fund movements, asset prices between different chains or bridges may experience short-term imbalances, which could be exploited. 3️⃣ I don't have a "clamp" (夹子), so I won't discuss it for now. 4️⃣ I don't have a liquidation bot (清算bot), so I won't discuss it for now. Inherent risks in the DeFi space do indeed exist. After five years of development, "code is law" seems to have become a joke. Will decentralized DeFi be replaced by semi-centralized CeFi? Perhaps the answer is already clear.