Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
SEC drastically reduces KYC pressure on Bitcoin, XRP, and Solana with revamped crypto rules
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has drawn its clearest line yet around which parts of crypto it views as outside securities law, a move that hands the industry a new map of regulatory winners while opening a narrower lane for privacy-focused technology.
However, the SEC’s new crypto taxonomy does more than just redraw markets. Quietly, the new approach blocks a regulatory path that could have forced developers and software providers into KYC-heavy broker-dealer regimes.
By classifying much of crypto activity as securities brokerage, the SEC’s earlier approach could have forced developers and software companies to register as broker-dealers, thereby requiring them to comply with strict identity checks (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) rules.
In an interpretive release issued on March 17, alongside the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the SEC categorized crypto assets into five categories: digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities.
The agency said digital commodities, digital collectibles, and digital tools are not themselves securities, while stablecoins may or may not be securities depending on their structure, and digital securities remain inside the SEC’s core jurisdiction.
Chair Paul Atkins framed the shift in broad terms. In remarks announcing the policy, he said the commission was implementing a token taxonomy under which digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and payment stablecoins under the GENIUS Act are not deemed securities, while digital securities, meaning tokenized traditional securities, remain subject to federal securities law.
The CFTC said it would administer the Commodity Exchange Act in a manner consistent with the SEC’s interpretation, giving the guidance immediate weight beyond a single-agency speech.
Named commodities move to the front
The digital commodity bucket is the most important part of the release because it reaches the largest pool of liquid crypto assets and provides a clearer path away from the securities hostilities overhang that defined the Gary Gensler era.
The SEC describes a digital commodity as a fungible crypto asset linked to the programmatic operation of a functional crypto system, with value tied to utility and supply and demand rather than the essential managerial efforts of others.
That definition strengthens the policy position around Bitcoin and Ethereum, but it also extends formal comfort to networks that have sat in a more contested middle ground, including Solana, Cardano, XRP, and Avalanche. XRP stands out because it spent years at the center of one of the industry’s highest-profile securities fights.
Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s chief legal officer, noted:
Solana, Cardano, and Avalanche also gain because the SEC release does more than classify tokens. It also addresses the network activities that help secure them.
For proof-of-work networks, the SEC said covered protocol mining activities do not involve the offer and sale of a security, which supports Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Bitcoin Cash. For proof-of-stake networks, the commission said covered protocol staking activities do not involve the offer and sale of a security either.
Meanwhile, that interpretation extends to staking by token holders, the roles of third-party validators and custodians, and the issuance and redemption of staking receipt tokens, which serve as one-for-one receipts for deposited non-security crypto assets.
That gives another layer of support to ETH, Solana, Cardano, Avalanche, Polkadot, Tezos, and Aptos.
The release also says redeemable wrapped tokens backed one-for-one by deposited non-security crypto assets and redeemable on a fixed one-for-one basis do not involve the offer and sale of a security in the circumstances described by the SEC.
Collectibles, memes, and utility tokens gain a lane
The second group of winners is smaller in market value but more surprising in political and cultural terms.
The SEC’s digital collectible category includes assets designed to be collected or used and lacking rights to income, profits, or assets of a business enterprise. Its examples include CryptoPunks, Chromie Squiggles, Fan Tokens, WIF, and VCOIN.
The inclusion of WIF, a meme coin, signals to markets that some community-driven tokens can be analyzed less as capital-raising instruments and more as cultural or collectible assets, though the SEC notes that hybrid structures can still raise securities questions.
The digital tools category is another beneficiary. The SEC defines digital tools as crypto assets that perform practical functions such as memberships, tickets, credentials, title instruments, or identity badges. Its examples include Ethereum Name Service (ENS) domain names and CoinDesk’s Microcosms NFT Consensus Ticket.
The commission says digital tools are on-chain analogues to physical utilities and that people acquire them for functional use rather than a claim on a business enterprise.
This is significant beyond the listed examples because it gives a clearer route for builders working on identity, access, naming, and credential systems. For a sector that has often had to explain why a token is a tool rather than an investment product, the SEC has now supplied its own framework.
Stablecoins also move into a stronger position, though with more conditions than the commodity bucket.
The release states that, once the GENIUS Act becomes effective, payment stablecoins issued by permitted payment stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act are excluded from securities status by statute. It also says other stablecoins may or may not be securities depending on the facts and circumstances.
That gives regulated dollar-linked issuers a clearer federal lane while keeping yield-bearing and more structured designs under closer scrutiny.
CryptoSlate Daily Brief
Daily signals, zero noise.
Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.
5-minute digest 100k+ readers
Email address
Get the brief
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Whoops, looks like there was a problem. Please try again.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
Privacy gets a quiet opening
While the SEC’s taxonomy creates no standalone privacy bucket, it narrows the range of crypto assets and crypto activity that sit inside securities treatment.
In the release, the agency says digital commodities, digital collectibles, and digital tools are not themselves securities, while also stating that the interpretation does not itself create new legal obligations. The commission separately says the Bank Secrecy Act and the Anti-Money Laundering Act are outside the scope of the action.
That language is why privacy advocates are treating the move as an opening for the sector, which had come under increased scrutiny over the past few years.
Independent journalist L0la L33tz argued in a post on X that the interpretation is a major privacy win because a broader broker-dealer framing for digital-asset developers and software-linked services could have pushed more of the sector toward KYC and AML obligations under securities law.
Her reading captures the shift in jurisdictional terms: a narrower SEC perimeter leaves more room for crypto software and non-security asset activity to exist outside the commission’s core registration regime.
The practical benefit of this is strongest around self-custody, open-source development, and non-custodial tools. The SEC’s digital tools category supports that view because it treats functional on-chain assets as utilities acquired for use rather than as claims on a business enterprise.
For privacy-focused builders, wallet software, credential layers, and related infrastructure, the release offers a clearer argument that software-linked crypto activity should be analyzed in terms of function and control rather than automatically through an investment-product lens.
Meanwhile, the remaining compliance boundary sits with Treasury and FinCEN. FinCEN’s 2019 guidance says an anonymizing software provider is not a money transmitter because supplying software differs from accepting and transmitting value.
In the same guidance, FinCEN says an anonymizing services provider that accepts and retransmits value is a money transmitter under its rules.
That leaves privacy advocates with a meaningful policy gain inside securities law while AML and money-transmission obligations continue to be handled through a separate federal framework.
The deeper market message
The broader significance of the SEC release is that it offers a sorting mechanism the industry has wanted for years without dissolving every legal question around token issuance and distribution.
The commission says a non-security crypto asset can still be offered and sold, subject to an investment contract that remains a security.
In practice, that means classification helps most when a token is closely tied to a functioning network, a practical use case, or a decentralized system rather than to a promoter’s ongoing promises about enterprise value.
That leaves the winners from this framework easier to identify. Bitcoin, ETH, Solana, XRP, and other named digital commodities gain the clearest immediate boost. Staking networks, wrapped non-security assets, digital tools, and payment stablecoins receive stronger legal framing.
Meanwhile, privacy-focused crypto projects gain a narrower but still important opening because the SEC has drawn a firmer boundary around its own authority.
So, the next chapter for the market will turn on how exchanges, issuers, developers, and Treasury-led compliance agencies respond to that new map.
Mentioned in this article
Posted in
Context
Related coverage
Switch categories to dive deeper or gain broader context.
Macro
Iran threatens major US companies in the Middle East creating new risk for crypto
Iran’s warning is not just a geopolitical headline. It could hit parts of the infrastructure and corporate balance sheets now tied to crypto.
7 hours ago
Bear Market
Bitcoin seems ready to push past $70k but one group keeps stopping the rally
Macro relief is building, but repeated rejection at $70k shows demand is still not strong enough to absorb supply.
9 hours ago
Bitcoin breaks from M2 money supply as dollar strength overrides global cash growth
Macro · 11 hours ago
Bitcoin’s support system snapped in Q1 — and the buyers that used to hold it up stepped back
Analysis · 13 hours ago
Bitcoin’s April bounce faces its first real test as Fed minutes loom
Analysis · 16 hours ago
Why Google’s quantum research targeted Bitcoin first and why that matters now
Quantum · 18 hours ago
Mining
US moves to break China’s grip on Bitcoin mining hardware with new Senate bill
The bill links mining hardware supply to national security, raising questions about how the US sustains its global hash rate lead.
1 day ago
Analysis
Bitcoin, stocks rally because of chatter that Iran is ready to ‘end the war’ as Dollar Index sinks below 100
Bitcoin’s bounce back above $68,000 hinges on hopes for Middle East peace amid fluctuating oil prices.
1 day ago
CLARITY Act deadline in weeks could kill stablecoin earnings and push money into Bitcoin
Regulation · 1 day ago
Bitcoin treasury trade faces a new test after Nakamoto sold $20M at a loss
Digital Asset Treasuries · 2 days ago
The IRS may see your crypto sale before you can prove what you actually owe
Taxes · 2 days ago
Bitcoin climbed before Wall Street after Iran speaker’s market warning
Macro · 2 days ago
Stablecoins
Tether hired top HSBC gold traders, then cut them weeks before auditors arrive
After months of expansion, crypto’s most important reserve machine is starting to look less like a growth story and more like a credibility campaign.
14 hours ago
Taxes
Congress proposes removal of widely used Bitcoin tax loophole and giving it to regulated stablecoins
The new Digital Asset PARITY Act draft would extend wash-sale rules to digital assets while shielding certain regulated payment stablecoins from routine gain-or-loss recognition.
3 days ago
The bets that made crypto prediction markets popular now targeted by ban threat
Analysis · 5 days ago
New Coinbase CLARITY Act standoff over stablecoin reward is now holding up rules for the entire US crypto market
Regulation · 6 days ago
Why crypto is now too embedded in US markets for regulators to keep making it up as they go
Politics · 1 week ago
Tether seeks first full audit as new financial rails risk leaving some stablecoins behind
Culture · 1 week ago
Encrypt Is Coming to Solana to Power Encrypted Capital Markets
Encrypt leverages fully homomorphic encryption to bring encrypted financial applications to Solana’s public blockchain.
2 days ago
Ika Is Coming to Solana to Power Bridgeless Capital Markets
Ika introduces dWallets to Solana, enabling assets from all networks to be managed without bridges.
2 days ago
TxFlow L1 Mainnet Launch Marks a New Phase for Multi-Application On-Chain Finance
PR · 2 days ago
BYDFi Marks 6th Anniversary with Month-Long Celebration, Built for Reliability
PR · 2 days ago
Pendle joins Vietnam IFC delegation alongside BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, and Deutsche Bank
PR · 2 days ago
The Perp Dex That Processed $360 Billion Just Went Live on Crypto’s Most Experimental Blockchain
PR · 2 days ago
Disclaimer
Our writers’ opinions are solely their own and do not reflect the opinion of CryptoSlate. None of the information you read on CryptoSlate should be taken as investment advice, nor does CryptoSlate endorse any project that may be mentioned or linked to in this article. Buying and trading cryptocurrencies should be considered a high-risk activity. Please do your own due diligence before taking any action related to content within this article. Finally, CryptoSlate takes no responsibility should you lose money trading cryptocurrencies. For more information, see our company disclaimers.