Jjsqk

SanDisk $SNDK broke through and reached it—I added a bit as planned.
Oppa, keep it up—noona, keep it up.

Not human—are there any brothers up at the top of the mountain? 🥹 $MRVL $SPCX $SNDK

Not cool—are there any brothers who are hanging on the top of the mountain? 🥹 $MEVL $SPCX $SNDK

Big $BTC drops below the 6.37 area. There’s a four-hour structural change. The current price is near the support line, with a rebound demand; after the rebound, the upside looks relatively reasonable. Reference range: 642-645. Defend 65.

At the start of each week—especially when data is released—it’s easy for things to move in the opposite direction first, confusing people.
This experience has been mentioned many times in the videos before; sometimes experience really is useful—you’ll gradually come to understand it.

A bit of a reminder: if you get silenced, occasionally share your thoughts. If you need it, come in.

Compared to M stocks, the tiny bit of volatility of the “bun” $BTC is still something they keep watching and doing every day—now that’s real love [hehe].

$BTC 623 broke the big one; it didn’t reclaim the arrow high point—there’s no need to rush into going long. Just wait below; or if it truly reclaims that level, then consider going long.

I feel that everything is back.

The video gives a warning about the risk of “big pie” $BTC , and the defensive position on the left. At the moment, the first direct position has been set. Today, I personally won’t consider placing a sell order.

Many people think $BTC hasn't hit bottom yet, and I agree with that. However, whether going long or short, I think a good entry price is essential.
For example, last time when it dropped to 82K, I started feeling around from 74K+, got stopped out twice with small losses, then entered around 77K on the right side. Even though I got stopped out, I think it was the right move, because the higher the price, the better the cost basis.
Now for shorts, what advantage does the cost have? (Ignore intraday hourly players.) Of course, you could say now that you're holding and just need to hold on. That'

Many people think $BTC hasn't bottomed yet, and I think so too. But regardless of going long or short, I believe a good entry cost is necessary.
For example, last time when it went to 82K, I started trying from 74K+ and had two small stop losses. Then I entered on the right side around 77K. Even though it stopped out, I felt it was the right thing to do because the higher the price, the better the cost.
But now, for shorting, what advantage does the cost have? (Intraday hourly traders can ignore this.) Of course, you could say that once you're locked in, just hold on. That's only because

Currently, $BTC did break a bit, but it didn't quickly follow through downward; instead, it recovered with such volume. At least now, judging by the hourly chart, it's still a bit early to say that a break means we're in the toilet. The previous post said don't rush to go long, which doesn't mean I'm very bearish ⬇️, it only means I'm a bit conflicted here.
(I'm not a permabull; everyone knows I'm essentially bearish 🈳 in the big picture. This consolidation period is just me looking for a better position to add back the shorts I reduced earlier. Last time we were just a few hundred dollars

The video mentioned that the big pancake $BTC 622 is very likely to be removed here, and it has already happened.
This is a short-term point worth paying attention to. What to pay attention to? Basically, whether there can be a small-scale structural shift here. If yes, try it out; if not, keep waiting and try not to do it on the left side.
#BTC

Big cake $BTC reaches the minimum target position from 742, so if we follow what the video says, it’s the direct operation part of 61’s “Duozi” (the in-house/official outlet portion).

Really good at creating activity, the expression is roughly a 6-6.4 fluctuation, buy high and sell low, and after a few words, you have to say such a long string
And why place a short at 63022 during the 6-6.4 fluctuation, to prevent missing the move 🤔