SoominStar

#USEndsLatestStrikesOnIran
US Ends Latest Strikes On Iran After 90 Targets Hit In Hormuz Push
US Central Command said its latest wave of strikes on Iran is over. The move came after a five hour op that hit about 90 sites tied to Hormuz ship lane threats. CENTCOM also noted a prior 90 minute round at 7:30 am DC time.
Where did US hit? List is long: Bandar Abbas, Bushehr, Chah Bahar, Jask, Konarak, Abu Musa, Khormuj, Ahvaz, Qeshm, Tunb, Kuh-e Stak and Sirik. Black and white clips showed runway gouges and launcher burns. One aim was to curb Iran push on tankers and box ships.
A side row erupted on July 14. Iran press said US hit a wheat silo in Hoveyzeh. CENTCOM said false. Truth was a hit on mil sites in Bandar Abbas, Khormuj, Ahvaz, Qeshm, Tunb, Bushehr and Kuh-e Stak to cut Iran ship hit power. Iran, for its part, hit US bases in Gulf lands and cut Hormuz flow for days.
Why this round? Truce broke on July 8. US and Iran had a short cease pact from June 28, but new ship hits in Hormuz broke it. US hit back for three days in a row, July 11, 12, 13, then a new wave July 14, 15. On July 10, President Trump told Congress that clash resumed July 7, opening a 60 day use of force window. He said action was to guard US folk and US goals in area. On July 15, US even reimposed a sea block on Iran ports.
Why halt now? Five drivers:
1. Cost high, risk of wide clash up. 2. Gulf peers pressed for calm. 3. Oil jump risk. 4. US wants Hormuz lanes open, not closed. 5. Back lane talks hint.
Iran reply was mixed. Public line hard, with vows and claims of hits on US bases. Private line more soft, with release of a US-Iran dual holder, Dena Karari, held since 2024. Trump praised it as good will.
Market pulse: Oil eased a bit after halt word, yet stays bid on Hormuz fear. Tanker rates stayed high. Gold eased. Stocks saw relief. For crypto, mood lifted. BTC held firm above key, ETH held, SOL and large alts saw buy flow. Fear gauge eased. Stable flow rose. On Gate, spot vol up, perp funding flat, ETF inflow firm.
What to watch next:
• Hormuz flow data and tanker track. • Any US-Iran talk sign. • CENTCOM briefs and oil block steps. • Iran base hit claims vs US reply. • Oil, DXY, US yields.
Trade view for Gate crew: Keep core spot, avoid high lever, use stop loss, use grid for chop, keep cash for dip, use Earn for idle USD. Do not chase FOMO spikes. Risk stays high, calm is frail.
Bottom line: US says job done for now, 90 sites hit, aim met. But Hormuz game stays live.

#CXMTPreIPOContractIgnitesCommunity
Why This Listing Matters
$CXMT is one of China's leading memory manufacturers. It produces DRAM and is expanding into HBM and DDR5 technologies to compete with major global memory producers. The $CXMT pre-listing contract allows crypto traders to gain exposure to the company's expected market value before its public listing. Traders can open long or short positions using $USDT as collateral, with continuous market access and no traditional brokerage account required.
What $CXMT Is
$CXMT develops DRAM products for smartphones, personal computers, servers, and next-generation HBM memory used in advanced AI accelerators. HBM remains one of the most important components in AI infrastructure. As production capacity expands, the company could become an increasingly important participant in the global memory market.
How the Pre-Listing Contract Works
This contract represents market expectations rather than ownership of company shares.
Key features:
• Quoted in $USDT.
• Margin available in $USDT or $USDC .
• Funding occurs every 8 hours.
• Cash settlement after the public listing.
• Price reacts to market demand, production updates, manufacturing progress, and semiconductor industry developments.
This provides digital asset traders with another way to participate in developments within the AI hardware sector.
Why the Community Is Paying Attention
1. Earlier Market Access
Many investors have limited access to early-stage opportunities in overseas equity markets. This contract offers exposure before the public listing.
2. AI Market Exposure
Many traders use the contract alongside AI-related digital assets including $RNDR, $AKT , $TAO , $FET and $GRT to diversify market exposure as semiconductor sentiment changes.
3. Strong Community Interest
High-profile technology companies often attract significant discussion across trading communities, generating active participation and higher trading volume.
Example Market Scenarios
• If $BTC remains strong and overall market sentiment improves, the $CXMT contract may attract additional buying interest alongside AI-related assets.
• Positive manufacturing updates may improve confidence across semiconductor-related markets.
• Weak sector sentiment could pressure AI-related digital assets while traders reduce overall market exposure.
Risk
Pre-listing contracts may experience:
• Higher volatility.
• Wider bid-ask spreads.
• Elevated funding costs during crowded positioning.
• Price fluctuations before final settlement.
Risk management and moderate leverage remain important when trading these products.
Conclusion
The $CXMT pre-listing contract provides crypto market participants with exposure to developments in the AI memory industry before the company's public market debut. It also offers another way to express views on semiconductor trends while remaining entirely within the digital asset ecosystem.
#CXMTPreIPOContractIgnitesCommunity

Chainlink CCIP Fees Hit $1.2 Million Weekly as SWIFT Banks Sent $480 Million in Tokenized T-Bill Transfers
Bank rails just paid Chainlink, and the receipt is on-chain. CCIP fees hit $1.2 million weekly, up 38% week over week, after SWIFT-linked banks sent $480 million in tokenized T-bill transfers across three chains. Total CCIP volume crossed $2.1 billion cumulative, with 42% in T-bills, 31% in stablecoins, and 27% in tokenized deposits.
Why banks used it matters. A pilot with 4 large banks and 2 fund managers uses CCIP to lock T-bills on Ethereum and mint a wrapped version on a private chain for collateral, with proof posted back to Ethereum. Settlement time fell from T+2 to 14 seconds for the collateral leg, and fail rate dropped from 2.1% to 0.2%. One bank moved $120 million of BUIDL-style T-bills per day with $180 average CCIP fee per $10 million move, versus $420 via legacy bridge.
On-chain flow shows stickiness. LINK staked via CCIP fee pool rose $18 million this week, and 68% of fees are now paid in LINK and burned, versus 32% in stablecoins routed to buy LINK. LINK burn from CCIP hit $820k weekly, while issuance for rewards was $610k, so net deflationary from this flow alone. Daily LINK active addresses rose 19% as new oracle jobs for T-bill NAV updates added $240k daily.
For traders, the math is yield plus scarcity. If $480 million weekly becomes $2 billion weekly by year end, fees hit $5 million weekly at same rate, or $260 million annualized, equal to 1.8% of LINK supply at current price. Perp open interest on LINK rose $210 million, funding near 0.01% per 8h, so spot led. LINK/BTC ratio added 4.1% on the week.
Risk is still central hooks. SWIFT messages can be delayed, and CCIP pauses if 2 of 3 risk networks flag a tx. Also, T-bill token issuers can freeze tokens, so a freeze could strand wrapped collateral. So far, zero freezes in 6 months.
When banks pay $1.2 million in a week to move $480 million of T-bills across chains, oracle rails have a business. That is why this week repriced LINK from data feed to cross-chain toll.
: #Chainlink #CCIP #SWIFT #Tokenization #LINK

Gold Prices Reclaim Above $4,000! Capital Returns, Bridgewater Weighs In
In recent weeks, gold prices have repeatedly tested the $4,000 threshold, making it a key focus for the market. As capital flows into gold-related assets show clear signs of returning—along with the release of Bridgewater’s latest views from the well-known institution—discussion about gold’s outlook has heated up, with investors turning their attention to where this asset goes next.
International gold prices at one point dipped below $4,000 per ounce, then regained this key level. According to Choice data, as of the time of publication on July 16, COMEX gold opened higher and then weakened, at $4,033.9 per ounce, down slightly by 0.44%. Since July, gold prices have been trading sideways and consolidating.
Gold-category ETFs have shown mixed performance. As of July 15, among stock-based gold ETFs, several have been leading the gains since the start of July, with multiple products up more than 7%; however, some commodity-based gold ETFs have edged down slightly.
Nevertheless, after experiencing net outflows during June’s gold-price turbulence and decline, gold-category ETFs have started to see capital return in July.
Data shows that in July, the net subscription shares for gold-category ETFs reached 960 million shares. Among them, Yongying’s gold-stock ETF is the biggest “money magnet,” and the interval net subscription shares for Cathay’s gold-stock ETF and Huaan’s gold ETF are also among the leading figures.
Institutions Discuss Gold’s Next Move
Recently, Hudson Attar, head of currency assets at global giant Bridgewater, also shared views on gold’s performance.
Why, even after geopolitical conflicts have evolved to this point and energy prices have eased somewhat, has gold not rebounded accordingly?
Hudson Attar said there are three reasons:
First, this conflict has still left a series of follow-on impacts. Most importantly, official reserve holders that previously sold gold or reduced their gold exposure via swap agreements tend to stay on the sidelines until normal conditions resume.
Second, investment demand that had pushed gold prices to around $5,500 per ounce before the conflict has not truly returned yet. To encourage investors to increase their allocation to gold again, new catalysts are needed, but at present there are no clear factors strong enough to prompt funds to return to the gold market. Even some factors are directing capital to other assets—for example, ongoing progress in AI infrastructure construction, and the solid returns of related stocks.
Third, over the past one to one and a half months, judging from the performance of various assets, the appeal of “currency depreciation trades” (i.e., investors increasing exposure to scarce assets such as gold to hedge losses from fiat currency depreciation) has changed noticeably. To some extent, this has driven down the prices of gold, Bitcoin, and silver, while the U.S. dollar has strengthened, U.S. Treasury term premiums have leveled off, and breakeven inflation expectations have declined.
However, some institutions still remain confident about gold’s outlook. Liu Tingyu, fund manager of Yongying’s gold-stock ETF, told reporters from the Shanghai Securities News that in recent times, the bearish impact on gold has gradually become muted, and bottoming characteristics are increasingly apparent. He believes that the market has over-priced trades tied to expectations of tighter policy from the Federal Reserve; as inflation and employment data weaken, this expectation is likely to be gradually corrected. #夏日创作营 $XAUUSD ‌

🚀 Gate Pre-IPOs project: OpenAI (OPENAI) subscription is Ongoing!
Subscribe premium IPOs with as little as 100 USDT.
🎁 Exclusive Gate Square Rewards
🔹 Repost a quality post to win 0.1 OPENAI share
🔹 100 lucky participants × $50 Position Voucher
📝 How to Join
1️⃣ Post with #PreIPOsSeason2OpenAISubscription
2️⃣ Share your subscription screenshot or your tips
Subscribe to SpaceX: https://www.gate.com/ipos/21
Announcement: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/100622

#PreIPOsSeason2OpenAISubscription
OpenAI Pre-IPO: The $895B AI Giant Opportunity or Overpriced Future?
The $895 Billion Question
OpenAI has become one of the most influential technology companies in the world in just a few years. From transforming AI adoption with ChatGPT to becoming a key player in enterprise automation, the company has moved faster than almost any technology company in history.
But there is one major question:
Is OpenAI’s current valuation a reflection of future dominance, or is the market already pricing in years of perfect execution?
For the first time, retail investors can explore private-market exposure through Gate Pre-IPOs Phase 2, bringing attention to a company that many investors previously could only watch from the sidelines.
But before investing, understanding the opportunity and risks is essential.
Gate Pre-IPOs Phase 2: Opening Private Market Access
Traditionally, investing in private companies before an IPO has been limited to venture capital firms, institutions, and high-net-worth investors.
Gate Pre-IPOs Phase 2 introduces a different approach by providing tokenized exposure through mirror note structures.
For the OpenAI opportunity, Gate is offering OPENAI asset certificates linked to the company’s implied valuation, allowing users to participate with a lower entry threshold compared with traditional private market investing.
However, investors should understand an important point:
These are not direct shares of OpenAI. They represent exposure linked to OpenAI’s valuation performance and come with their own structural risks.
Why OpenAI Became the AI Market Leader
OpenAI is not simply another AI startup. It created one of the fastest-growing technology platforms in history.
ChatGPT changed how consumers, developers, and businesses interact with artificial intelligence.
The company’s growth has been driven by three major areas:
Enterprise Adoption
Businesses are increasingly integrating AI into customer service, software development, research, marketing, and automation.
The biggest opportunity is not only consumer subscriptions but becoming essential infrastructure for companies worldwide.
Developer Ecosystem
OpenAI’s API platform has attracted thousands of developers building AI-powered applications.
A strong developer ecosystem creates a powerful advantage because every new application increases the value of the platform.
Strategic Partnerships
The relationship with Microsoft provides OpenAI with access to cloud infrastructure, enterprise distribution, and significant computing resources.
This partnership remains one of OpenAI’s biggest competitive advantages.
The Global AI Investment Wave
OpenAI’s valuation cannot be viewed separately from the broader AI market.
Artificial intelligence has become the largest investment theme in technology, attracting billions of dollars from venture capital firms, corporations, and institutional investors.
Investors are betting that AI could become a foundational technology similar to the internet, cloud computing, and mobile platforms.
If OpenAI successfully becomes the leading AI infrastructure provider, the long-term opportunity could be enormous.
The Bull Case: Why OpenAI Could Continue Growing
AI Platform Dominance
OpenAI has the possibility of becoming the core platform layer for AI applications.
Similar to how Google dominated search and Amazon dominated cloud infrastructure, OpenAI is attempting to become a central AI ecosystem.
AI Agents: The Next Growth Phase
The next major evolution is AI agents.
Instead of only answering questions, AI systems may eventually complete complex tasks, manage workflows, and operate as digital employees.
If OpenAI captures this market, revenue opportunities could expand significantly.
Data and Improvement Cycle
More users create more feedback, better models attract more users, and stronger models attract more enterprise adoption.
This creates a potential growth cycle that could strengthen OpenAI’s position.
The Bear Case: Major Risks Investors Must Consider
Valuation Risk
An implied valuation near $895 billion already assumes massive future growth.
At this level, investors are not only buying current performance — they are buying expectations of future AI dominance.
If growth slows, valuation compression could become a major risk.
Competition Risk
The AI market is becoming increasingly competitive.
Companies such as Google, Anthropic, Meta, and open-source AI developers are investing heavily.
The future winner may not simply be the company with the strongest model, but the company that delivers the best combination of performance, cost efficiency, and ecosystem adoption.
Profitability Challenge
Building advanced AI models requires enormous spending on computing power, research, and infrastructure.
The key question is whether revenue growth can eventually exceed these costs.
Structural and Liquidity Risk
Pre-IPO products have different risks compared with publicly traded stocks.
Investors should consider:
• Limited liquidity before IPO
• Possible price differences from actual company valuation
• Regulatory uncertainty
• Dependence on the structure provider and market conditions
Understanding Mirror Note Exposure
The most important point:
OPENAI Pre-IPO exposure through Gate is not the same as owning OpenAI equity.
The value is connected to the company’s valuation, but investors should carefully understand the conversion process, redemption conditions, lock periods, and potential risks before participating.
Private market investing requires patience because IPO timing is uncertain.
Dragon Fly Framework: How I Evaluate Pre-IPO Opportunities
My framework focuses on four key areas:
Business Strength
Does the company have real growth, competitive advantages, and a strong market position?
Valuation
Is the price justified by future potential, or is the market already too optimistic?
Structure
Does the investment vehicle clearly explain ownership, risks, liquidity, and exit options?
Time Horizon
Can investors remain patient if the IPO takes longer than expected?
Using this framework:
OpenAI scores extremely high in business potential, but valuation and structural risks require careful consideration.
Who Should Consider This?
Potentially suitable for:
Long-term investors who believe AI will reshape the global economy.
Investors seeking private market exposure.
Risk-tolerant participants who understand volatility.
Crypto-native users comfortable with tokenized assets.
Who Should Avoid This?
This may not be suitable for:
Investors needing guaranteed liquidity.
People investing money they cannot afford to lose.
Short-term traders expecting quick profits.
Anyone who does not fully understand pre-IPO risks.
Final Thoughts
OpenAI represents one of the biggest technology stories of this generation.
The company has strong fundamentals, a powerful brand, major partnerships, and a leading position in artificial intelligence.
But a great company does not automatically mean a great investment at any price.
The $895 billion valuation already reflects enormous expectations. Success depends on continued AI adoption, maintaining technological leadership, controlling costs, and expanding into future AI markets.
For investors considering Gate Pre-IPOs Phase 2, the key question is not:
"Is OpenAI a great company?"
The real question is:
"Can OpenAI grow enough to justify today’s valuation?"
Dragon Fly Official believes the opportunity is interesting, but disciplined risk management remains the most important factor in any pre-IPO investment decision.
What is your opinion?
Is OpenAI’s valuation justified by its AI leadership, or is the market already pricing in too much future growth?
‍#PreIPOs第二期OpenAI认购

📢 The Gate Plaza Summer Creative Camp is now open—there’s a $50,000 USDT prize pool waiting for you to share.
Post original content with the topic #夏日创作营 to participate.
🎁 New authors get a 50 USDT contract voucher for their first post. Unlock 100 USDT vouchers as you accumulate posts. Every day, lucky newcomers win $5 USDT in cash.
🏆 All creators who meet the requirements will share $500 USDT, and high-quality content will also get an extra $20 USDT + a featured placement + 7 days of traffic support.
📅 July 15 - July 27, 24:00 (UTC+8)
👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/100685

#夏日创作营
Based on current form, squad strength, tactical matchups, and recent prediction market pricing, this looks like a highly balanced final. However, no one can know the outcome for sure before the match; the following are informed predictions, not facts.
🏆 My 2026 FIFA World Cup Final Prediction
Spain 🇪🇸 - Argentina 🇦🇷
My Prediction
* Winner: 🇪🇸 Spain
* Predicted score (90 minutes): Spain 2–1 Argentina
* Alternative possible outcome: 1–1 after 90 minutes, Spain wins in extra time or on penalties.
Spain has been the strongest defensive team in the tournament, while Argentina has been the most productive attacking team. This makes it a classic "defense vs. offense" final.
My Cup Prediction
🏆 Spain will lift the FIFA World Cup trophy.
Win and Draw Probabilities (My Model)
Outcome Probability
🇪🇸 Spain wins 49%
🤝 Draw after 90 minutes 27%
🇦🇷 Argentina wins 24%
(Draw refers to the score at the end of normal time.)
Expected Match Result
Match Result (90’)
Spain 2–1 Argentina
Possible goalscorers:
* Lamine Yamal
* Nico Williams
* Julián Álvarez (Argentina)
Key Players
Spain
* Lamine Yamal ⭐
* Nico Williams
* Pedri
* Rodri
* Unai Simón
Argentina
* Lionel Messi ⭐
* Julián Álvarez
* Enzo Fernández
* Alexis Mac Allister
* Cristian Romero
Tactical War
Spain
* High ball possession rate
* Fast passing
* Pressing
* Strong defense
Argentina
* Fast counter-attacks
* Messi's creativity
* Julián Álvarez's mobility
* Final experience
Polymarket Prediction
Current Polymarket predictions favor Spain slightly:
* World Cup Champions
* 🇪🇸 Spain: ≈58%
* 🇦🇷 Argentina: ≈42%
For the match itself, Polymarket's live predictions also currently favor Spain, but the specific odds differ as a draw is a possible outcome at 90 minutes.
🏟 Match Event Card
Competition
* FIFA World Cup 2026 Final
Match
* 🇪🇸 Spain - Argentina 🇦🇷
Venue
* MetLife Stadium, East Rutherford, New Jersey
Prediction
* Spain 2-1 Argentina
Probable first goalscorer
* Lamine Yamal
Man of the Match
* Lamine Yamal
Expected possession percentage
* Spain 59%
* Argentina 41%
Expected shots
* Spain: 15
* Argentina: 11
Corners
* Spain: 6
* Argentina: 4
Yellow cards
* Spain: 2
* Argentina: 3
Penalty?
* 28% probability
Extra time
* 24% probability
Penalty shootout
* 13% probability
Final Prediction Summary
🏆 Champion: Spain
🥈 Runner-up: Argentina
⚽ Score: Spain 2–1 Argentina
⭐ Man of the Match: Lamine Yamal
👟 Best Argentinian Player: Lionel Messi
📈 Polymarket Favorite: Spain (~58%)

#夏日创作营 Waller spoke for two consecutive days—what exactly should the market take away?
Inflation hasn’t announced it’s over, and AI capital expenditure hasn’t hit the brakes either. Waller hasn’t issued a rate-hike alert, nor has he sounded the signal for rate cuts. What he really wants to tell the market is this: inflation is improving, but there’s no reason to celebrate yet; AI investment is accelerating, and that will help keep the U.S. economy resilient.
On July 14 and 15, Waller appeared on Capitol Hill for two straight days: on the first day before the House Committee on Financial Services, and on the second day after moving to the Senate Banking Committee. Both hearings ran long and featured many questions. But if you remove the repetitive parts, the main thread isn’t complicated. Here’s a small detail first: the two days submitted the same written testimony. So, look at the underlying judgments he emphasized again and again, and then see what genuinely new information is worth the market’s attention in the live Q&A.
I. Inflation is cooling, but Waller won’t pop the champagne early
The CPI and PPI released around the hearings were milder than the market had been worried about. If you swapped in a Fed chair who was more willing to calm the market, they might have used the moment to say a few words like “the progress is encouraging.”
Waller, of course, also acknowledged the data is moving in the right direction—but he hit the brakes quickly. “Someone might look at this morning’s data and say, the job is done, everything is fine. But that is not how I see it.”
At the Senate, he put it even more precisely: “These indicators can’t perfectly reflect the true state of underlying inflation.” In market language, this means: the data is indeed getting better, but a month of CPI and PPI is not enough to prove inflation has been fully brought under control. What Waller cares more about is whether core inflation, service prices, wages, and inflation expectations can all cool down together for several consecutive months. So his underlying stance is still hawkish. In his formal testimony, he said the Fed “has no tolerance for persistently elevated inflation.” However, a hawkish target doesn’t equal immediate rate hikes—between the two is still an entire set of data.
II. What truly interests him is capital expenditure still accelerating
If I had to remember just one economic variable from Waller’s two days of remarks, I wouldn’t pick CPI—it would be business capital expenditure. “The most striking feature of the economy right now is business investment.” His testimony highlighted two standout numbers: as of Q1, equipment investment was up about 8% year over year, and within that, high-tech investment grew by nearly 25% in Q4. Data centers, chips, servers, software, and power infrastructure are forming the most important incremental force in the U.S. economy. This also helps explain why the U.S. economy has not shown a clear recession for so long: consumption may not be especially strong, and real estate is relatively weak, but large tech companies’ investment is still keeping the economy going. As long as this round of capital spending doesn’t clearly hit the brakes, the Fed doesn’t have an urgent reason to cut rates to save the economy.
For the market, what’s truly worth watching next isn’t only the monthly inflation print, but also large tech firms’ earnings, data center buildout plans, and capital expenditure guidance for the second half of the year. Especially as August approaches, new guidance from companies may matter more than a single month’s CPI in shaping the market’s views on growth and interest rates.
III. Will AI push prices higher?
Waller made an important distinction: AI investment isn’t free. Data centers need to buy chips and equipment, consume power, and compete for engineering and technical talent. When demand surges in a concentrated way, related prices can easily rise. Waller acknowledged at the Senate that AI investment could push up some “measurable prices” over the coming year. But he added immediately: “I do not think a one-time change in prices necessarily constitutes inflation.”
That distinction is crucial. Chips can rise once due to supply-demand tightness—those are relatively one-off price changes. The central bank worries is when the price increases spread into wages, services, and inflation expectations, forming cycle after cycle—then you’d get persistent inflation.
Waller’s logic is: AI capital expenditure will increase demand in the short term, but in the long run it may improve productivity and expand supply. Whether it ends up as inflation or lower costs depends not only on supply response, but also on whether the Fed deals with potential demand overheating in a timely way.
IV. AI and jobs: optimistic, but he didn’t say it all
On employment, Waller was generally more optimistic than the market expects. He believes that building data center and AI infrastructure will require substantial investment in the near term, and that will also drive hiring across industries such as engineering, chips, software, and power. “In the short term, AI investment has a positive effect on employment.” “Over the long term, AI is expected to become a net creator of jobs.” Still, he admitted the technology transition won’t be frictionless. Some jobs will be replaced, and some roles will be redefined. When the productivity gains from AI actually translate into higher wages remains a “puzzle.” That suggests the Fed won’t loosen policy early just because “AI might cause unemployment.” At least for now, what Waller sees is capital expenditure driving jobs, not AI triggering mass layoffs.
V. Rate hikes or rate cuts next? He just won’t say
In both hearings, lawmakers kept pressing the same question: what exactly comes next? Waller’s answer stayed consistent—no rate guidance. “If I tell you today what the meeting in two weeks is preparing to do, we might only want to accept information that fits existing judgments and reject information that doesn’t.” That’s his rationale for weakening “forward guidance.” Once the Fed hints at hikes or cuts in advance, it could end up binding itself to commitments, and the market would treat every sentence like a trading password.
The problem is: the market can’t stop guessing. Less guidance means a single future economic data release could trigger bigger moves in U.S. Treasury yields and volatility in equities. Waller talking less doesn’t mean the market will be calmer—often, the opposite is true. Putting together the two days of remarks and the latest inflation data, the probability of immediate rate hikes in late July has clearly declined. But with inflation still above the 2% target, the economy not in recession, and AI investment continuing to expand, there are also not enough reasons for rate cuts recently. The most reasonable baseline scenario is still to hold steady and keep observing.
VI. On Fed reform, and the market’s focus on balance sheet reduction. Beyond rates, Waller is also preparing to re-examine the Fed itself.
He set up five working groups to study communication methods, the balance sheet, economic data, AI and jobs, and the inflation framework. It sounds like a comprehensive check-up after a new leader takes office. The balance sheet is what the market cares about most.
Waller has long believed that after a crisis ends, the Fed shouldn’t keep holding an excessively large bond portfolio for the long term. But this time, first he reassured the market: “Any changes will be discussed thoroughly, explained publicly, and ensure the market can understand them.”
In other words, a balance sheet of about $6.8 trillion can’t shrink back overnight. Even if adjustments are made to Treasuries and MBS holdings or to the ample-reserves regime in the future, there will be prior communication. For the short term, there’s no need to worry about a “sudden balance sheet contraction.” Over the medium to long term, though, investors should watch whether Treasury term premia may rise. Still, his intent is to look for opportunities to reduce the balance sheet. After this news broke, U.S. markets fell on the 15th. Tech stocks that had rallied earlier and were trading at rich valuations continued to plunge.
VII. Under political pressure, he gave a very “central-banking-style” answer
Lawmakers also asked what he would do if Trump demanded rate cuts. He didn’t directly say, “I would refuse the president,” but used an answer very typical of a central bank: “I will follow the law, and I will follow the data.”
That answer is fine in principle, but it still leaves room. At the Senate hearing, he also didn’t confirm whether he had spoken with Trump after becoming chair. The market’s questions about Fed independence won’t disappear completely because of a single hearing; they can only be verified through future real interest-rate decisions. At least based on what we’ve seen over these two days, Waller hasn’t leaned into the White House by signaling immediate cuts. Instead, he repeatedly emphasized the inflation goal and policy discipline—somewhat showing the market that he isn’t here to press a “rate cut button.”
So what should the market understand in the end?
Compressing the nearly six hours of hearings into a summary, there are four takeaways:
First, the inflation trend is improving, but the Fed is not ready to declare victory.
Second, the near-term risk of rate hikes is falling, but that doesn’t mean the rate-cut window is already open.
Third, the most important support for the U.S. economy is still capital expenditure driven by AI; as long as investment keeps growing, it’s hard for the economy to quickly lose momentum.
Fourth, the real policy turning point will only come when persistent inflation, jobs, and business capital expenditure all deliver clearer signals at the same time. Therefore, these two days of remarks are neither a “rate-hike alarm” nor a “rate-cut trumpet.” More precisely: short-term tail risks have decreased, but the market still needs to wait for capital expenditure and the inflation trend to provide the answer.
Waller isn’t willing to write the next-step script for the market. Next, U.S. Treasury yields, tech stocks, and global risk assets will likely have to find their own way through the data.

🚨 Community Buzz Today: Gate launches $CXMT Pre-Market Perpetuals — the battle between whales is on!
📈 Open interest exceeded $23 million just hours after $CXMT went live
📈 Whales continue to battle on both the long and short sides, with market sentiment sharply divided
📈 Pre-market volatility is intensifying as capital flows continue to increase
Everyone’s discussing:
🔥 Are you bullish or bearish on $CXMT?
🔥 Is it better to build a position early or wait until the official listing?
🔥 Will CXMT see an even bigger rally after it goes public?
🎁 Join the discussion
Join daily discussions for a chance to win 250U Futures Position Vouchers!
👉 Join Gate Hot Chat👇
https://gate.onelink.me/Hls0/group?chatroom=group&ref=VVhBVA9a&ref_type=105

📢 Copy trading masters phase 2 recruitment is live！
💰Post and share in the square—show your profits or recommend your favorite traders to easily grab a share of the 11,500 usdt prize pool!
【First copy trade & share reward】 First-time copy traders who post will get a 20 usdt trial fund directly!
【Content incentive reward】 Keep posting high-quality content and the top 10 based on engagement will exclusive share 500 usdt!
【Top master leaderboard】 Battle for the top spot based on your copy trading volume!
🔗 Register Now:https://gate.onelink.me/7pdk/628997d710e63c7c

#PreIPOsSeason2OpenAISubscription #夏日创作营
Based on current form, squad strength, tactical matchups, and recent prediction market pricing, this looks like a highly balanced final. However, no one can know the outcome for sure before the match; the following are informed predictions, not facts.
🏆 My 2026 FIFA World Cup Final Prediction
Spain 🇪🇸 - Argentina 🇦🇷
My Prediction
* Winner: 🇪🇸 Spain
* Predicted score (90 minutes): Spain 2–1 Argentina
* Alternative possible outcome: 1–1 after 90 minutes, Spain wins in extra time or on penalties.
Spain has been the strongest defensive team in the tournament, while Argentina has been the most productive attacking team. This makes it a classic "defense vs. offense" final.
My Cup Prediction
🏆 Spain will lift the FIFA World Cup trophy.
Win and Draw Probabilities (My Model)
Outcome Probability
🇪🇸 Spain wins 49%
🤝 Draw after 90 minutes 27%
🇦🇷 Argentina wins 24%
(Draw refers to the score at the end of normal time.)
Expected Match Result
Match Result (90’)
Spain 2–1 Argentina
Possible goalscorers:
* Lamine Yamal
* Nico Williams
* Julián Álvarez (Argentina)
Key Players
Spain
* Lamine Yamal ⭐
* Nico Williams
* Pedri
* Rodri
* Unai Simón
Argentina
* Lionel Messi ⭐
* Julián Álvarez
* Enzo Fernández
* Alexis Mac Allister
* Cristian Romero
Tactical War
Spain
* High ball possession rate
* Fast passing
* Pressing
* Strong defense
Argentina
* Fast counter-attacks
* Messi's creativity
* Julián Álvarez's mobility
* Final experience
Polymarket Prediction
Current Polymarket predictions favor Spain slightly:
* World Cup Champions
* 🇪🇸 Spain: ≈58%
* 🇦🇷 Argentina: ≈42%
For the match itself, Polymarket's live predictions also currently favor Spain, but the specific odds differ as a draw is a possible outcome at 90 minutes.
🏟 Match Event Card
Competition
* FIFA World Cup 2026 Final
Match
* 🇪🇸 Spain - Argentina 🇦🇷
Venue
* MetLife Stadium, East Rutherford, New Jersey
Prediction
* Spain 2-1 Argentina
Probable first goalscorer
* Lamine Yamal
Man of the Match
* Lamine Yamal
Expected possession percentage
* Spain 59%
* Argentina 41%
Expected shots
* Spain: 15
* Argentina: 11
Corners
* Spain: 6
* Argentina: 4
Yellow cards
* Spain: 2
* Argentina: 3
Penalty?
* 28% probability
Extra time
* 24% probability
Penalty shootout
* 13% probability
Final Prediction Summary
🏆 Champion: Spain
🥈 Runner-up: Argentina
⚽ Score: Spain 2–1 Argentina
⭐ Man of the Match: Lamine Yamal
👟 Best Argentinian Player: Lionel Messi
📈 Polymarket Favorite: Spain (~58%)

$ORDI has broken out of the symmetrical triangle and successfully retested the breakout zone.
The price is already gaining momentum, showing that buyers are stepping in strongly.
Holding above the retest level keeps the bullish structure intact and could trigger a powerful continuation move.
A bigger pump may be approaching as momentum builds toward the next major targets.
Keep $ORDI on your watchlist and track the price action closely.

#广场预测世界杯赢40000U
World Cup Final Prediction: Argentina vs. Spain June 27, 2024 For immediate release World Cup Final Prediction: Argentina vs. Spain July 20, 2026 MetLife Stadium, New York/New Jersey - With the FIFA World Cup fast approaching its thrilling conclusion, anticipation is mounting for the predicted showdown between the reigning champions Argentina and the tactical maestros from Spain in the 2026 Final.
The predicted finalists, based on their current tournament performance and futures markets, are poised for an epic clash at MetLife Stadium.
Prediction Market & Odds Analysis Based on available futures odds from major sportsbooks, Spain is considered the slight favorite to lift the trophy. Spain currently sits at -165 to win the World Cup, while Argentina is priced as the underdog at +135. Implied probabilities are closely aligned with live sentiment, suggesting Spain has approximately 57.5% chance of winning, compared to Argentina’s 42.5%. Key Factors Supporting Spain 2-0 semifinal victory over France, highlighting their clinical finishing and tactical structure.
Possess a dominant midfield that can control possession and stifle transitional counterattacks.
Benefitting from fresh legs and squad depth due to a measured approach throughout the tournament. Demonstrates a strong tactical discipline and a low rate of defensive errors in the knockout stages. Key Factors Supporting Argentina Defending champions with a proven history in knockout stage matches.
The leadership and set-piece prowess of Lionel Messi remain a direct threat to the opponent. Showed immense mental resilience in their 2-1 semifinal comeback victory against England. Seeking to become the first team since Brazil (1958/1962) to win back-to-back World Cups.
My Analysis: Spain's methodical build-up and ability to suffocate teams in midfield create a structural challenge for Argentina's more vertical transition game.
Argentina's strengths lie in moments of individual brilliance and their solid defensive organization, but sustained pressure on the ball has historically exposed teams in high-stakes matches. The efficiency of Spain's squad rotation and a potentially lower physical fatigue index offer a distinct advantage in the pressure-cooker environment of a single-elimination final. While the championship pedigree of Argentina is undeniable, Spain's tactical consistency and youthful vigor present them as the more probable winners. Prediction: Spain wins 2-1 in regulation time Market Confidence: Spain ~58% | Argentina ~42% Gate Prediction Market Opportunity The Gate Prediction Market is now live for the World Cup Final!
Submit your detailed predictions to the market and you could win from a prize pool of $40,000 USDT.
Originality and well-researched insights are key to higher visibility and earning potential. Get your predictions in early, manage your exposure wisely, and monitor how probability shifts over time.
‍#WorldCupPrediction #GatePredictionMarket #SportsAnalysis