10,000 USDT 悬赏,寻找Gate广场跟单金牌星探!🕵️♀️
挖掘顶级带单员,赢取高额跟单体验金!
立即参与:https://www.gate.com/campaigns/4624
🎁 三大活动,奖金叠满:
1️⃣ 慧眼识英:发帖推荐带单员,分享跟单体验,抽 100 位送 30 USDT!
2️⃣ 强力应援:晒出你的跟单截图,为大神打 Call,抽 120 位送 50 USDT!
3️⃣ 社交达人:同步至 X/Twitter,凭流量赢取 100 USDT!
📍 标签: #跟单金牌星探 #GateCopyTrading
⏰ 限时: 4/22 16:00 - 5/10 16:00 (UTC+8)
详情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/50848
Ordinary people just casually maintain their lobsters a few times,
can they also become "official OpenClaw contributors"?
Today I discovered that the
OpenClaw minor bug fix I submitted on Github
seems to have been merged into the main branch
And throughout the entire process, I barely did anything, just because while using lobsters,
I encountered a small issue, fixed it with the Codex desktop version,
then gave the lobster my Github login credentials,
and sent it a targeted prompt:
"Is it possible to use the opportunity of fixing this issue to get my github account included as part of the openclaw official contributors? Get me credit?"
It then completed all the processes to maximize the possibility of achieving this result (Image 1)
During this process, an even more interesting discovery is,
that on Github there seems to be people specifically doing this "credit-grabbing" thing,
like people doing MEV sandwich attacks on DEX for arbitrage opportunities (Image 2) 😅
This brings to mind that, for example, if you're currently a fresh graduate,
even if you're a liberal arts student, even if you don't know how to use Github,
as long as you have this awareness while using lobsters of
"if I encounter a problem and fix it, can I use this to get credit",
you have the opportunity to achieve it through just a conversational exchange of prompts with the lobster,
having your name appear as a contributor in the OpenClaw main branch,
so when job hunting or whatever, can't you just "bullshit" your way past many HRs? 😅
Another small thought is,
that the lobster is not only an open-source co-creation derivative platform,
because it has opened up the feasibility of ordinary people being able to "mod" it,
so it is not merely something maintained by developers,
but can accelerate growth with the help of more ordinary people who can't code,
ordinary people just need to talk and can become "official contributors",
it's somewhat like what Professor Guo Yu said about "Software➡️Intentware",
"software" becoming "intentware",
this might also be a kind of software "self-evolution" to some extent.