Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just caught Trump weighing in on the stablecoin yield battle, and honestly, this whole situation is getting wild. He basically called out banks for trying to block crypto companies from offering returns on digital dollars, saying it'd be a massive competitive disadvantage for the US if we don't get our regulatory house in order.
So here's the backdrop: there's this ongoing tug-of-war over the Clarity Act, which is supposed to be the regulatory framework crypto has been waiting for. The issue? Banks are freaking out that if crypto platforms pay yield on stablecoins, customers will just move their money out of traditional accounts. Last year's Genius Act banned issuers from doing this, but nobody was totally sure if it applied to third-party platforms like exchanges. Banks want that loophole closed. Crypto companies say banks are just trying to relitigate something that was already settled.
They actually looked like they were getting somewhere in January with a compromise - allow rewards for transactions and DeFi stuff, but no passive yield. Then the CEO of a major exchange pulled his support right before the vote, citing the passive yield ban. That pretty much nuked the whole thing, and Senator Tim Scott (who heads the Banking Committee) shelved the vote indefinitely.
Here's where it gets spicy: Trump's family company holds a significant stake in World Liberty Financial, which issues its own stablecoin. His son Eric also jumped into the debate on X, basically saying banks are hypocrites for offering terrible rates while blocking crypto from offering better deals. Obviously, Democrats are pointing at this and saying it's a clear conflict of interest. The White House pushed back through their deputy press secretary, saying Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his kids, so no conflicts.
What's interesting is how much this regulatory battle matters for Trump's stated goal of making the US the crypto capital of the world. If the Clarity Act doesn't move, that whole vision kind of stalls. The crypto industry needs clarity, banks want protection, and meanwhile the whole thing is stuck in political limbo. Feels like something's gotta give here.