😳 I just came across this BONK governance story, and it's honestly wild if the reports are accurate.



Apparently, someone accumulated around $4M worth of BONK, then submitted a DAO proposal requesting that 4.4 trillion BONK be sent to a wallet they controlled.

The proposal reportedly sat unnoticed for seven days, with little to no scrutiny. When voting closed, the proposer used their voting power to vote YES, the proposal passed, and the 4.4T BONK was transferred to their wallet.

The tokens were then allegedly sold, resulting in an estimated $20M total return—roughly $16M in profit.

The craziest part? Reports say only one person voted NO, leaving a comment along the lines of: "They didn't specify any clear idea of what they could do differently." 😂

If this is an accurate reflection of what happened, it's another reminder that DAO governance is only as strong as community participation and oversight.

What do you think—governance failure or simply the rules of decentralized voting at work?

#BONK #DAO #Crypto #DeFi #Governance #So
BONK2.41%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned