Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
You know, I've been thinking about Warren Buffett's TSMC situation, and it's honestly one of the most interesting cautionary tales in recent market history. The guy built a nearly 6,100,000% cumulative return at Berkshire Hathaway by sticking to his principles — and then one decision just blew up in his face to the tune of roughly $16 billion.
Let me break down what happened. Back in Q3 2022, when the market was getting hammered, Warren Buffett and his team spotted what looked like a classic dislocation. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing was trading at reasonable prices during the bear market, and more importantly, TSMC was positioned right at the center of the AI boom that was about to explode. They loaded up — 60 million shares, $4.12 billion stake. On paper, it made perfect sense.
Here's the thing though. Buffett has always preached a long-term mindset. Own great businesses, hold them for decades, let compound returns do their work. But with TSMC? He broke that rule spectacularly. By Q4 2022, just a few months later, Berkshire had already started dumping the position. They sold 86% of the stake in that quarter alone, and completely exited by Q1 2023. The whole thing lasted maybe five to nine months.
When asked about it in May 2023, Warren Buffett said something about not liking TSMC's location and reevaluating. Probably referring to geopolitical risks and China export restrictions. Fair concern on the surface, but the timing was absolutely brutal.
Because here's what actually happened next. Nvidia's GPU demand went absolutely insane. TSMC's advanced chip production became the bottleneck everyone was fighting over. The company's growth accelerated dramatically, and so did the stock price. Fast forward to July 2025 — TSMC hit the trillion-dollar club.
If Berkshire had just held that original stake instead of panic-selling? It would be worth close to $20 billion today. Instead, that decision cost them around $16 billion in unrealized gains. That's the kind of mistake that sticks with you.
The irony is almost too perfect. Warren Buffett built his entire empire on the principle of long-term thinking and trusting in quality businesses during uncertain times. TSMC was exactly that kind of business — a leader in its industry with sustainable competitive advantages. But he let short-term concerns override his core philosophy. It's a rare stumble from someone who's usually so disciplined about his investing rules.
Makes you wonder what his successor Greg Abel is taking away from this. Probably that sticking to your principles matters more than trying to time geopolitical shifts.